What choice do I have? Everyone's a critic, right? So can you blame me for weighing in on the most anticipated movie event of the season? Especially when the movie is a musical? The musical I just directed last spring? Indulge me.
The movie version of Les Miserables is a cinematic masterpiece. Director Tom Hooper gives the viewer the panoramic scope of revolution and the close up brutality of its effects on Victor Hugo's iconic characters. The movie drags you along through the dank, dreary, and desperate time through streets, sewers, and along the Seine with tight frames and sweeping cinematic shots. Les Miserables the movie does what a movie can and should do as a visual medium. Naturalism and realism are expected in film and Hooper delivers.
Which is why Les Miserables the cinematic masterpiece made me appreciate Les Miserables the theatrical masterpiece even more.
There have been other non-musical movie versions of Les Miserables, the most notable being the one with Liam Neeson as Valjean. Hugo's story is epic and requires epic story-telling one way or the other. It's a great story.
What makes Les Mis the musical singular in the history of musical theatre is its score! Boublil and Schoenberg wrote and composed a score as powerful and soaring as the story. It is in the best sense, an opera. Schoenberg's music serves the story note by note, measure by measure from crescendo to crescendo - from recitative to soaring ballad - forte to pianissimo - the music is what makes the musical.
And the music is what was missing in the movie. Oh sure it was there - kind of. Boublil and Schoenberg both are credited as part of the screen writing team. Somehow, in the mix, Boublil forgot about his partner. In a musical that makes my insides explode with emotion with the thunderous and brilliantly woven four- part barricade sequence, I was caught up in the realistic slaughter of idealistic students without the accompanying musical underscore. It was there, buried beneath the rubble - barely audible most of the time. There were selected moments when the music did what it is capable of doing - the heart breaking strings swelling as we take in the deadly toll of the battle but the music was secondary to the visually graphic cinematography.
Don't get me wrong - I know that movies are a visual genre. But oh how I missed Fantine's powerful belt in I Dreamed a Dream and the stillness of Valjean's Bring Him Home. Taking nothing away from Ann Hathaway's cheek bones, which we saw aplenty - or Hugh Jackman's mop of curly hair that barely grayed over the decades - both of whose performances I thought were credible with an abundance of tears in close ups that made the songs intimate at best and unmoving at worst...and so let's talk about Russell Crowe.
What were they thinking? Two of the best songs in the musical reduced to a semi-spoken, choked performance by a non-singer is perhaps the most grievous offense of all to the score.
In terms of storytelling, I thought the placement of I Dreamed a Dream was a startlingly good choice and the addition of the song Suddenly that Valjean sings about Cosette helped fill out a weak plot point in the musical.
Master of the House lost its charm although it had more than capable performances by Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter as the Thenardiers. Directorially, the much needed comic relief descended into the dark abyss with the rest of the story.
They might have shaved thirty minutes off the movie had they simply picked up the tempos which were at times dirge-like serving the close up naturalistic approach to the songs.
This worked best as Marius (Eddie Redmayne) sang Empty Chairs at Empty Tables - though "the grief that can't be spoken"was there in abundance as the tears poured down the young man's face. His voice still soared where it needed to. Hooper left most of the Cosette (Amanda Seyfried) and Marius songs alone and that was a good choice.
But what happened to Eponine (Samantha Barks)? Somehow, her character felt diminished - albeit rain drenched for A Little Fall of Rain - she disappeared at the end - a love story lost in the shadows.
So what does this all prove? As a theatre director and advocate, it reminded me that plays and movies are completely different genres. The theatre by its very nature is larger than life and an epic story like Les Mis can be told simply, representationally, and effectively with the creative expanse that can happen only on the stage and in the imagination of the audience.
And a great score like Les Miserables should be sung.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree. A movie will always be challenged to capture the emotions of a story like Les Mis. I loved the movie but feel that sometimes musicals feel "awkward" when trying to sing what could be short bits of dialogue.
ReplyDelete